Gregory L. Deans
This page documents the conduct of attorney Gregory L. Deans in the Bayport Laboratories litigation against Milagros Garcia and Giselle Garcia. Every statement on this page is sourced to his own emails, his own court filings, or to publicly filed motions and police reports. We are not asking you to take our word for anything. We are showing you the record.
Who He Is
Gregory L. Deans is counsel of record for Bayport Laboratories, LLC and Yaumara Camacho in the Texas state-court action filed against Milagros Garcia (Cause No. 2025-41725, Harris County), and is the attorney whose conduct is the subject of a pending Motion to Disqualify Plaintiffs' Counsel filed in the federal action Garcia v. Bayport Laboratories, LLC, et al., No. 4:25-CV-3676 (S.D. Tex.) (Hon. Keith P. Ellison).
Defendants Milagros and Giselle Garcia have moved to disqualify Mr. Deans on grounds of "litigant safety, record integrity, and due process."
The grounds are below — in his own words.
In His Own Words
The following are direct quotations from Mr. Deans's communications and filings. Each is on the docket or in counsel's files.
October 11, 2025 — 5:08 PM (email to Milagros Garcia)
"Everyone knows what you are up to. We wish you would stop, but your efforts to extort money from Bayport, their owners, and their business associates will be unsuccessful. We also know this isn't your first rodeo with these tactics. You seem like a smart person who could lead a productive life rather than trying to get rich this way."
This is an unsolicited email from opposing counsel accusing a pro se litigant of extortion — a criminal offense — without charges, evidence, or any court finding.
October 12, 2025 — 1:19 AM (text/message to Milagros Garcia)
"How does this end? How much money do you want?"
Sent at 1:19 in the morning.
October 12, 2025 — Garcia's response (early morning)
"Please refrain from harassing me. Stop. No further contact."
A clear, contemporaneous cease-and-desist.
October 12, 2025 — late morning (continued contact, after Garcia's "stop" demand)
"Why did you contact SOS? That will be one of the questions when we take your deposition… It is a robust record of harassment aimed at recovering millions of dollars."
Continued direct contact, hours after the no-contact instruction. A second accusation that Ms. Garcia is engaged in "harassment aimed at recovering millions" — again, without charges, without evidence, and after she had told him to stop.
Statements made to third parties (per Defendants' Motion to Disqualify)
Per the Motion to Disqualify filed in S.D. Tex. 4:25-CV-3676, Mr. Deans has stated that he and his team would:
- "make an example of" Giselle Garcia
- ensure she "gets not a dime"
- that his job is to "stop her"
These are not descriptions of legal defenses or claim elements. They are categorical, punitive objectives directed at a specific party.
December 26, 2025 — email re: "Influencers Motion for Contempt"
[verify quotes from Deans Email Dec 26 2025 - Influencers Motion for Contempt.pdf before publishing — full text on file with counsel.]
January 20, 2026 — email subject line: "Aggressor Stop You"
[verify full quote from Deans Email Jan 20 2026 - Aggressor Stop You.pdf before publishing — full text on file with counsel. Date is significant: same day Judge Hughes dissolved the TI.]
October 12, 2025 — Police Report
After Mr. Deans's continued contact in the face of an explicit cease-and-desist, Milagros Garcia filed a harassment report with the Houston Police Department.
- Incident Number: 1338433-25
- Complaint Type: Harassment
- Investigating Unit: Major Assault Division (escalated)
This is a public-record law-enforcement matter.
October 29, 2025 — Motion for Contempt Without an Actual TRO
On or about October 29, 2025, Mr. Deans filed a Motion for Contempt for Violation of TRO, premised on a Temporary Restraining Order purportedly issued October 9, 2025.
Per the record: no TRO was ever served on Ms. Garcia or her counsel before the motion was filed. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(b) requires service before a TRO has binding effect.
The court nonetheless scheduled the contempt hearing within 24 hours of notice to Ms. Garcia — while taking no action on the disqualification and misconduct motions Ms. Garcia had previously filed against Mr. Deans.
Misuse of Sensitive Medical Information
Per the Motion to Disqualify (S.D. Tex. 4:25-CV-3676):
"Counsel inserted himself into highly sensitive trauma-related medical matters concerning Ms. Garcia's status as a survivor of rape and human trafficking, attempting to 'verify' those records without trauma-informed handling and in an adversarial posture."
Giselle Garcia is a non-employee, never worked at Bayport, and is a documented survivor of human trafficking. Mr. Deans's handling of her medical and trauma-related information is a stated ground for disqualification.
What the Rules Say
The Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct and the ABA Model Rules speak directly to the conduct documented above. We are not making findings — those belong to the State Bar and the courts. We are pointing to the rules a reasonable reader can compare to the record.
| Conduct documented above | Rule potentially implicated |
|---|---|
| Communications having no substantial purpose other than to embarrass, delay, or burden | TX Disc. R. 4.04(a); ABA Model Rule 4.4(a) |
| Conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation | TX Disc. R. 8.04(a)(3); ABA Model Rule 8.4(c) |
| Conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice | TX Disc. R. 8.04(a)(4); ABA Model Rule 8.4(d) |
| Knowing assertion of unsupported facts to a tribunal | ABA Model Rule 3.3(a)(1); TX Disc. R. 3.03(a)(1) |
| Threats of criminal prosecution to gain advantage in a civil matter | TX Disc. R. 4.04(b)(1) |
| Continued direct communication after explicit no-contact instruction | TX Disc. R. 4.04(a); applicable Texas harassment law |
These are general references, not legal conclusions. The State Bar of Texas and the federal court have exclusive authority to interpret and apply these rules.
What's Pending
- Motion to Disqualify Plaintiffs' Counsel Gregory L. Deans — pending, S.D. Tex. 4:25-CV-3676 before the Hon. Keith P. Ellison
- HPD Harassment Investigation #1338433-25 — open, Major Assault Division
- State Bar of Texas grievance — [verify status before publishing — counsel to confirm whether a grievance has been filed]
Why We Are Publishing This
Pro se and indigent litigants — particularly trafficking survivors and whistleblowers — are uniquely vulnerable to the kind of attorney conduct documented above. Public accountability is one of the few mechanisms available where institutional remedies are slow.
This page is not a finding of guilt. It is a record of what an attorney said, when he said it, and what filings and police reports followed. The reader can decide what to make of it.
If you have additional public-record information about Mr. Deans's litigation conduct, contact: info@bayportlabslawsuits.com.
Sources
- Email from Gregory L. Deans to Milagros Garcia, October 11, 2025, 5:08 PM (on file)
- Email/message from Gregory L. Deans to Milagros Garcia, October 12, 2025, 1:19 AM (on file)
- Email from Gregory L. Deans to Milagros Garcia, October 12, 2025, late morning (on file)
- Houston Police Department Incident Report #1338433-25 (October 12, 2025)
- Garcia v. Bayport Laboratories, LLC, et al., S.D. Tex. No. 4:25-CV-3676 — Plaintiffs' Motion to Disqualify Plaintiffs' Counsel (Gregory L. Deans)
- Cause No. 2025-41725, Harris County, Texas
- Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct (TX State Bar)
- ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct
- Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)
- Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32 (1991)
- In re American Airlines, Inc., 972 F.2d 605 (5th Cir. 1992)
- Leyendecker & Assocs., Inc. v. Wechter, 683 S.W.2d 369 (Tex. 1984)
Source-Based Content. No Legal Advice. Copyright & Fair Use. No Harassment or Doxxing. Quotations are direct excerpts from communications and filings of the named attorney; this page is journalistic reporting on a public lawsuit and a public-record police investigation. Media contact: info@bayportlabslawsuits.com.